Definition - #301 - #09 - The question that solves “ALL”!

(“If you’re stuck in a rut, it’s because you don’t have a “successful alternative!!”)

Suppose I gave you a standard question that stops all argument and meaningless discussion?
(However, it’s a question that requires a “moderated” answer ….a true answer to a question! Not another vague “for instance”, or, “my uncle used to say”, or, “I believe ….” NO!… It must be a true answer to the specific question!)

(So here it is …)**** “What’s the successful alternative?” ****

The true answer starts with the words … “A successful alternative is ….” (or might be) ….

You start with these words and I’ll listen to you all day!!!

BUT!!! .. Start with “For instance…”, or, “Another way to look at it is…” or anything else; and I would rather take a nice warm bath!!!

The question calls for a specific response… i.e. “A successful alternative!!!” Not a criticism, not a description, not “anything else”!!! …. Just a “specific response!!!!
This “question” stops meetings, family arguments, political tirades, complaints, etc.

No one is currently being challenged for a constructive idea, namely, “a successful alternative”. There’s usually immediate silence!! But human nature being what it is, you are liable to begin to hear…”Well. for instance…”

It’s now necessary to call “time”!! ….to remind people that you have asked a specific question which requires a specific “answer”!! This is my reference to a “moderated response”. You lose all the advantages of “the question” if you don’t immediately have people stay within the rules….. “A successful alternative is …”

Most people have not been trained; or, have not been made aware of, the direct way to answer a specific question. In fact, most people never do answer directly. They will usually postulate a different question or circumstance as an answer to a question. Perhaps not having an immediate, appropriate answer causes them to become insecure and their immediate response is supposed to gain “time”. You will also get a “defensive”, aggressive response from people who, either, don’t have a response or become defensive when they are out of ideas. It’s very revealing!!!

Such a simple question .. “What’s the successful alternative?”

What a revealing response you can get. One thing for sure; if you have a little control over the path of the discussion (as a moderator), it will become quite silent. The comments that follow will become more meaningful, more useful. (No more shouting. … No more “oral static”)

(It, also, just might start the exchanges in a search for a “mutual” definition!!! …Wouldn’t that be nice!!!!)

Definition - #301 - #8 – The “house painter”, the “Art student”, and the “Wise man”

And now a story……

A man paints a kitchen chair blue. There are no runs, no blank spots, no paint on the floor, etc. He gets a ticket to the Louvre Museum and stands before the Mona Lisa.
“My God what a painter! There’s no paint on the frame. The floor is clean. There’s no paint on the walls. My God what a painter!”
An art student, after four long years, finally graduates from graduate school and goes before the Mona Lisa.
“My God what a painter! Look at the brush strokes, the composition, his palette. My God what a painter!
The wise man goes before the Mona Lisa and ponders and then says “I wonder why he painted that picture?”

So each person has there own special reaction based on his experience. None is correct or right. They’re only different………
But if you want to be a house painter, for heaven’s sake stay with house painters. You will not be comfortable with others.
If you’re an art student, at least be aware of the trip to be taken to become a “wise” man. Try to understand the difference. Try to understand the effort involved.

(Of course, that’s only if you want to become something different than you are now!! There always are other choices. You can always stay the same and be comfortable with the people like yourself.)

Definition - #301 - #7 – What’s the difference between a Conversation and an Argument?

If you don’t clearly know the difference between “an argument” and “a conversation”, the chances are you are “arguing” 90 % of the time!!! Is that what you want? Well, how do you know, if you don’t know the difference!!!

Before you start defending yourself, let me ask and answer some questions……

1. If you think one is louder than another; can’t you have a quiet “argument”? How about the Supreme Court? Don’t they “argue” most of the time? Volume is NOT the difference!!
2. If you have a disagreement, do you have to have an “argument”? Can’t you disagree and still have a quiet “conversation”? Disagreement is NOT the difference!!
Get the problem? If you knew the difference, someone could argue with you; but, you wouldn’t have to argue with them. While they’re arguing, you would be “conversing”!! …. Possible???… You bet!!

I would like to propose some definitions…….

1. A “conversation” is an oral exchange, between two or more people, WHERE THE SOLE PURPOSE IS TO EXCHANGE VIEWS. One must reach “mutual definitions and understandings” of these views. With no positive attempt to gain “mutual understanding, we don’t begin to have even a “meaningful dialogue”.

2. An “argument” is an oral exchange between, two or more people, where ONE PERSON STATES HIS OPINION AS FACT”!!! There is little or no attempt to find mutual understanding!! One is faced with a personal opinion stated as a fact. “You are wrong!’…. “Americans think …” …… “The government is….” There’s no discussion. There’s no attempt to state that “this is only your opinion”. This is stated as a fact!!! That’s an “argument”.

Try this question on your friends. If you really ask good questions about the “so called answers” you receive, you’ll prove to yourself that most people do not understand the difference!

If the purpose of meaningful oral exchange is to get someone to understand your point of view, the least you can do is “NOT” state your opinion as a “fact” but merely as “your opinion”. At least that’s a first step!! If they’re not motivated or trained (educated?) to ask meaningful questions about what you meant; they will immediately react by giving you their opinion stated as “the fact”. The fight is on!!!

If the purpose of “your” oral exchange is to find out what your friend “meant”, you will react by asking good, clear, meaningful questions. They may want to argue. You want to “understand”. If, then, you wish to give your point of view, state it as “your, personal point of view”….. “NOT as a fact”!!!

(Much of this subject has to do with “definitions’. Obviously if you still don’t know what the “definition of a definition” is, you are “handicapped” to begin with!! … see, again, Series #101 - # 02)

Definition - #301 - #54 - The NEW America - get used to it!

New communities grow where there are foreign languages spoken and where there are customs and traditions that are foreign to American citizens.

“Multi-culturalism” is a popular slogan. Do you really know what it means? Does everyone have the same ideas about this slogan?

New interpretatations about the Law and, whether or not the Law even exists, are to be expected in some of these new communities. After all, bribery is a way of life in some foreign countries! In some communities there is no law!

The arrival of foreign T.V. programs on the daily media constantly express the value of assimilating to the language and culture of the American experience. Nothing makes people want to exist in a comfortable environment more than a language that is familiar. Why bother to assimilate?....(in the Law or in Language?)

If unfamiliar customs (of politeness, of quality in the workplace or in the home, graciousness …first in line or a left hand turn, etc.) are unrecognizable; then we American citizens must get used to it and recognize it for what it is…unfamiliar in some of the foreign communities. It’s a case of unfamiliarity not flat something that’s done willfully. If a written contract is violated, let it be “unfamiliarity” rather than willful neglect…….. Get used to it!

If, as an American citizen, you lean on the letter of the law to protect you; do not wonder why this isn’t as effective as it once was….”unfamiliarity”! The law is now something to be beaten rather than a coarse of conduct. The Government is something to take advantage of rather than some process “to aid and comfort” for the short time….(not a way of life!)

If we have certain American citizens that do not make a life of Government a dole; we are not giving permission to others to follow this criminal few. We Americans recognize that all its citizens do not obey the laws. But we have built a society that works reasonably well. Newcomers to this society or this country must find a way to contribute….in both money and in “familiarity” with our customs and laws. This is what made America a land of opportunity….NOT a land to be taken advantage of!

The NEW America “is not nor will it” be the land we knew. It’s changing! There are an increasing number of strange faces and languages in our society. Can we keep it “a land of opportunity”? We realize there are changes. Can we keep these changes in such a way that the spirit of America does not change! Will “unfamiliarity” or “familiarity” be the watchword?

Definitions - #301 - #6 - How to find out what you “DON”T” know!!!

What a question !!! ….Whaddy’a mean find out what you “DON”T” know!!!!!
How do you do that?
How can you find out about something you don’t know anything about!!!
How can you ask for help if you don’t know what you need help “about”????
How can you get advice from your “guru” if you don’t know what to ask him???
If I don’t know …. I simply don’t know!!!! …..(You’re frustrating me!!!)

1. – Let me present a possible “successful alternative”…….

At the very least, you can explain your present dilemma to your “guru”. He can ask you questions until he’s sure he understands what you are trying to say. He “must” try to have a mutual understanding of what you are talking about! Can you, now, relate these simple facts to your “guru”. At least this IS something you CAN DO!!!! … Right???
Sometimes the mere attempt at explaining your dilemma in terms that another can understand is enough. You might have gained a new understanding about your situation by this simple exercise. Maybe you didn’t know “exactly” what you were thinking …or saying.

II. –However, here is what you accomplished ….

1. You and your “guru” can now attempt to have a “mutually understood exchange”, a conversation that is constructive because you have agreed on what you’re discussing.

2. Perhaps you have developed a question for him … namely ….What should I do about this? ….. What’s this all about? …. What are my “successful alternatives”? (Do you go to the Doctor and say …”Fix me up, Doc!” and don’t tell him what you feel like? After all this is not a game you are playing. You’re looking for help! Don’t you want to give him some information? )

III. – Here is what you need ……

1. You need a “guru” you can communicate with … someone who will question you about what you are actually saying (not what you meant to say) ….. someone who is trained to seek “mutual understanding” …. a “mutual definition”.

2. You need a “guru” who can help you express what you felt … “a successful alternative”, a new appreciation of the situation, a possible improvement, or (most importantly) if there is “nothing” you can do!!! (To know you can do “nothing” is as important as knowing if there is “something” you CAN do!!!!)

3. You need to know that you need assistance!!!! It’s difficult sometimes to try to understand everything by yourself. No one is going to eat you if you just try and listen and try to understand what another respected person’s idea is. You, too, must make an effort to question this other person so you can make sure you understand what he’s talking about. Don’t be in such a hurry to express your own opinions! After all, didn’t this conversation start with your desire to seek another person’s view? Didn’t you already have your own opinions? What have you gained if all you do is express your own opinions again? (Besides, the other person hasn’t the time for this useless exercise!)

IV. Perhaps the most difficult part of all of this is……
You must realize you need assistance.
You must realize this is NOT a criticism, or a deficiency in yourself.
You must realize that you do not need to defend yourself . (You have merely asked for another opinion!)
And, lastly, you can always disagree with what you’ve heard!!!

IV. – Please, please understand the difference between “repeating” what you’ve just heard or read; and, “understanding” what you’ve just heard or read!!!

A “Label” is no substitute for content or understanding!
Because you “name” it something does NOT add anything to my understanding!

“Volume” is no substitute for content or understanding!
Because you say it “louder and louder” doesn’t add to my understanding!

“Repetition” is no substitute for content or understanding!
Because you say it over and over again doesn’t add to my understanding!

Special Note:
As we discussed, “words” are important.
“Mutually defined and mutually understood” words are the ONLY meaningful way to exchange ideas.


“Is there a successful alternative?”

Definitions - #301 - #05 – To “know” versus to “understand”.

(The “Hammer and Nail” story)

I. First a story…….
Suppose I give you a hammer and a nail for the first time.
I “teach” you to use them.
You “learn” to use them.
You actually “use” them.
You “remember” how to you use them.
And finally, you “memorize” how to use them.
To repeat….I teach, you learn, you use, you remember, and you memorize how to use them.

Fairly complete? ….Yes? …….

So I give you a hammer and nail and you drive a nail right through the pane glass window!
You forgot one thing!!!
You don’t “understand” a hammer and a nail!!!! You “know” about a hammer and nail but you don’t “understand” the hammer and nail

II. Look what this means!!…..

I send you to school and they “teach’ you the English language.
You “learn” the English language.
You “use” the English language.
You “remember” the English language.
You “memorize” the English language ….. But you don’t “understand” the English language!!!!

III. You don’t recognize the difference between “to know” and “to understand”!!!! ….

IV. You can now imagine what this means….for now and for the future. Were you aware of the difference?

V. How are we going to cope with people who haven’t been introduced to this kind of thinking? We are talking about “Definition”, “Understanding”, “Mutual”, and “How do you have a thought?” “Is there a successful alternative?”; or, do we just have to recognize this deficiency and “do” something about it?

(By the way, who is capable of “teaching” this? …. Who “understands” this?)

Definitions - #301 - #04 - How do you have a thought?

I. Interesting question. “How do you have a thought?”
1. How does a “thought” differ from a “reflex”?
2. How does a “thought” compare with an “emotion”?
3. What kind of a “process” will help untangle these words?

II. Please try and be patient …... Please try to follow this little description:
(I would like to draw a sort of “mathematical picture” that I hope will help.)

1. If you take a dot in space and move it in a direction, you will create a “line in space” which we will call the “First Dimension”.
2. If you move the line in a direction you will create “plane in space” which we will call the “Second Dimension”.
3. If you move the plane in space you will create a “cube in space” which we will call the “Third Dimension”.
4. But the whole process cannot happen if there is no “space” which we’ll call the “Fourth Dimension”.
5. But if there’s no energy to move these “things” nothing could happen. We’ll call the moving force “energy” and it can be named the “Fifth Dimension”.
6. What is the source of this energy? We’ll call that the “Sixth Dimension” and so forth….

III. Now let’s try to use this picture in a “human” form.

1. If you have a “reflex” (i.e. breathing, smelling, hearing, etc.) , there is very little use of the brain. Let’s call “reflex” the “First human Dimension.
2. If you have an “emotion”, there is a little bit more brain power exerted in the reaction. Let’s call “emotion” the “Second human Dimension”.
3. If you use your “intellect” (i.e. for information, logic and reason …. more brain power), let’s call this the “Third human Dimension”.
4. There must be something beyond intellect, logic and reason. Let’s use the term “wise”. Let’s call “wise” the “Fourth human emotion”
5. There must be something beyond wise, let’s call it “faith”. Let’s call this the “Fifth human Dimension”. And so forth…..

IV. So…the more the “brain” is involved the higher the “Dimension.

1. “I’m completely emotional!” … this is an advertisement of a “Second Dimension” person….a person whose brain is only slightly involved. ….a little more than pure “reflex”, but still a minimum of “brain” involvement.
2. “I’m an intellect.” …. I believe that logic and reason are the end in itself…the highest form of human. This is an advertisement of a “Third Dimension” human. This person is unaware of any other “Dimension”; unaware that there’s more in life than pure logic and reason.
3. “He’s a wise person.” …. This is a person who knows that reason and logic (known information) are not the end of things. There must be more. It’s not necessary to know what it is. It’s only necessary to reach out and see what there might be, knowing that the search is the adventure. This is a description of a “Fourth Dimension” human being.
4. Etc., etc. …
5. Which “Dimension” are you? What “Dimensions” are your friends? Which dimension do you want to be?
(and ….Thanks for being patient….)

VI. So back to “How do you have a thought?”

1. You speak to yourself!!! You express something to yourself!! You USE WORDS!!! You talk to yourself!!
2. In each person’s throat there is a three way valve. One direction is “out of your mouth”. One direction is “to your brain”. One direction is “out of both at the same time”!
3. If you believe this, you can no longer say “It’s on the tip of my tongue!” Certainly you said something to yourself. You can certainly repeat what you told yourself, or, you simply did not have that thought!! You don’t own that thought!!
4. Think what happens if your communication skills are poor.

If your language is poor, your thoughts are poor!!
If your thoughts are poor, what do you think your conclusions are going to be like?
Can you make good choices if your thoughts are poor?

So, now, do you realize the connection between “Definition” and “Thought”?

Now do you realize how important language is? …….

Definitions - #301 - #03 -Words, Words, Words!!!!

(Whaddy’a mean “What do I mean”?)

Let’s try something……..

I. –“I would “like” to be an American.”
1) Which American?… A rich American, a poor American, an educated, an uneducated, a successful, an unsuccessful, a new citizen, an old citizen, a young, an old…..Get my drift?
2) What about a Southern American, a Northern one, a small town one, a big city one…Get my drift?
3) How about a Black American, a White, a female, a male, an Asian ….Get my drift?
4) “Who” are we talking about? …...… What do you mean?
5) Who do you wish to be “like”? …… What do you mean?
6) Yes, I do speak English!!!! ……….. “Whaddy’a mean?”

II. – “I would like to live in a country “like” America.”
1) Which “country”?... South, North, Mid West, farming country, city country, suburban country…
2) You mean “like” as in a “duplicate”; or, as in “with the all the same characteristics”; or, as in “some of the characteristics (i.e. Which ones in particular?) …Get my drift?
3) Which “country” are we talking about? …...Whaddy’a mean?
4) Which “America” are you talking about? ….Whaddy’a mean?

III. HOW ABOUT....I want to live in a “Democracy!!!”…Oh my gosh!!!
I want a “real relationship”!!! ……..Oh my gosh!!!
I want to be “free”!!! ………………Whaddy’a mean?

So, maybe now, you see the problem!!

If you don’t spend the time necessary to “mutually” communicate, to “mutually” arrive at a definition; you are merely making noises at each other. I doubt if the exchanges of noises will produce any significant results. Are you talking “at” someone; or, are you talking “with” someone. Did it ever occur to you to find out?

The “process” is “TO ASK!!!” … “ASK” what is meant!!!….Try to mentally meet each other, to arrive at “mutually” understood definitions…. Spend the time!!!…… “What’s the successful alternative??”


So, again, maybe now you see the problem!! ……..

Words, Words, Words!!!!

Definitions - #301 - # 02 – What’s “the” definition of a “definition”?

I. Unless you have tried to answer this question yourself, you will not have the appreciation and understanding of what this answer might be. Isn’t it true that if I point to the sky and remark how “green” the sky is today; and then, look at the grass and remark how “deep blue” the grass is today; that you could understand what I was referring to? You could then discuss the “green” sky with me. True, I could now identify your meaning of “green” with my usual meaning of “blue”. We could exchange. We have a “mutual” understanding of your definition of “blue and green”. It may not be efficient but it is “mutually” understandable.
We have “defined” blue and green by relating them to objects that we both can observe. We have “sort of defined the words” mutually. We both understand the terms in future exchanges. But, if I had not recognized the relationship with the objects of sky and grass, I wouldn’t have a clue to what you were referring!!! How about Republican, Democrat, free society, American…get what I’m getting at?

II. A “label” is no substitute for understanding.
Because you call “it” something, because you “name” it something; does NOT add to my understanding. It remains just a word. There is no “definition!

III. “Volume” is no substitute for understanding.
Because you say it “louder” does NOT increase my understanding!

IV. “Repetition” is no substitute for understanding.
Because you say it over and over again does NOT increase my understanding

V. Is there a successful alternative to “definition”?
Now do you see what happens if you don’t know the “definition of a definition”!! If you don’t know what it is; how are you going to have a “mutually understood” exchange with me. What we now have is “oral static”!!!

My definition of “oral static” is…..

“The proper placement of, proper English words, in a proper sentence that “means nothing!!!” …It’s just noise! …. It’s just “static”!!! … It’s just “oral static”!!

How often have you engaged in an exchange of “oral static”? Neither party is interested in finding out what the other party meant when they said “………..”

Neither party is trained, or educated, or motivated to try to first find out what the other party means. But as night follows day, each party will have an answer or an opinion of what “each thought the other meant!!!” If that isn’t an exchange of “oral static” I don’t know what is!! What’s the use? What is gained? There is no “mutual understanding”! It’s just noise!!

Yet people get angry. People get disgusted, frustrated, loud, etc. over something that neither party has tried to understand. …..They just stay there and yell at each other! … Leave in a huff! … All because people haven’t thought about the possibility of “first” trying to understand!


Talk about “conflict resolution”!!! How is that possible without “first” realizing that an effort must “first” be made to establish a “mutual definition” of what you’re talking about. Chances are that in a “mutual” pursuit of “mutual understanding” there will be little or no conflict.

So what do I think is the “definition of a definition”? ……..

My definition of “definition” is …

The word “Definition” is the name given to a “process” by which things are separated into ever smaller parts.
A rock is harder than snow, but softer than a diamond. A rock is heavier than a feather. A rock is usually rougher than silk. A rock can be almost as rough as barbed wire. Etc., etc. …..
By relating to things that we “both” are aware of, we engage in a “process” of breaking the word down into ever smaller distinctions. This can also be applied to “an idea”, to an opinion”. Before you can answer , you must first “define”.
“Is there a successful alternative”?

There is NO need to speak at each other, only with each other!
There is no need to yell (volume), no need to “repeat”, no need to “label” something (as though the “label” increases understanding).
No need to do anything “at” each other!! … only “with” each other!!

This could help to “define” the word “mutual” and “understanding”.

Without these thoughts, how can you have a “mutual exchange” that is meaningful, constructive, thought provoking? How can you have a “conflict resolution”? How can you enjoy the mutual exchange of thoughts and feelings? How can you truly enjoy your conversations with others?


So how important is the “definition of a definition”???

Current - #201 - #20 - Leave it to Robin Williams to come up with a "Peace" plan !

(Hard to argue with this logic!)

“I see a lot of people yelling for peace but I have not heard of a plan for peace. So, here's one plan”:

1. The US will apologize to the world for our "interference" in their affairs, past & present. You know, Hitler, Mussolini, Tojo, Noriega, Milosovich and the rest of those 'good ole boys.' We will never "interfere" again.

2. We will withdraw our troops from all over the world, starting with Germany, South Korea and the Philippines. They don't want us there. We would station troops at our borders. No one sneaking through holes in the fence.

3. All illegal aliens have 90 days to get their affairs together and leave. We'll give them a free trip home. After 90 days the remainder will be gathered up and deported immediately, regardless of who or where they are. France would welcome them.

4. All future visitors will be thoroughly checked and limited to 90 days unless given a special permit. No one from a terrorist nation would be allowed in. If you don't like it there, change it yourself and don't hide here. Asylum would never be available to anyone. We don't need any more cab drivers or 7-11 cashiers.

5. No "students" over age 21. The older ones are the bombers. If they don't attend classes, they get a "D" and it's back home baby.

6. The US will make a strong effort to become self-sufficient energy wise. This will include developing nonpolluting sources of energy but will require a temporary drilling of oil in the Alaskan wilderness. The caribou will have to cope for a while.

7. Offer Saudi Arabia and other oil producing countries $10 a barrel for their oil. If they don't like it, we go some place else. They can go somewhere else to sell their production. (About a week of the wells filling up the storage sites would be enough.)

8. If there is a famine or other natural catastrophe in the world, we will not "interfere." They can pray to Allah or whomever, for seeds, rain, cement or whatever they need. Besides most of what we give them is stolen or given to the army. The people who need it most get very little, if anything.

9. Ship the UN Headquarters to an isolated island some place. We don't need the spies and fair weather friends here. Besides, the building would make a good homeless shelter or lockup for illegal aliens.

10. All Americans must go to charm and beauty school. That way, no one can call us "Ugly Americans" any longer.

Now, ain't that a winner of a plan?!

"The Statue of Liberty is no longer saying 'Give me your poor, your tired, your huddled masses.' She's got a baseball bat and she's yelling, 'You want a piece of me?'"

Definition - #301 - #53 - “To Ignore” is a good thing!”

“To ignore” is NOT TO FORGET but to temporarily put aside what you worry about!
You can “ignore” and find rest!

“Ignore” has a temporary feeling.
“Forget” has a permanent feeling.

“Ignore” means to temporarily put aside. It does not mean “to abandon”. You can find temporary relief from the things that stress you. You can always confront them later.
“To ignore” is not a bad attribute. It just means that you are tired and need a rest.

You can “ignore” an argumentative person but you don’t necessarily have to forget him. You can “ignore” a subject that seems inappropriate. You can “ignore” an ugly relationship. You do not have to eliminate it permanently. “Ignore” can be a great help in your life!

Sometimes the pain of having to give up on someone or something is simply too much. You can “ignore” it for a length of time and get back to it!….(If you wish…!)

Keep in mind the word “IGNORE”. It might be useful in the future!

Current - #201 - #19 - THIS WILL OPEN YOUR EYES !

By Paul Harvey – “Conveniently Forgotten Facts”

Back in 1969 a group of Black Panthers decided that a fellow Black Panther named... Alex Rackley needed to die. Rackley was suspected of disloyalty Rackley was first tied to a chair. Once safely immobilized, his friends tortured him for hours by, among other things, pouring boiling water on him. When they got tired of torturing Rackley, Black Panther member, Warren Kimbo took Rackley outside and put a bullet in his head.
Rackley's body was later found floating in a river about 25 miles north of New Haven, Conn.

Perhaps at this point you're curious as to what happened to these Black Panthers. In 1977, that's only eight years later, only one of the killers was still in jail. The shooter, Warren Kimbro, managed to get a scholarship to Harvard, and became good friends with none other than Al Gore. He later became an assistant dean at an Eastern Connecticut State College.

Isn't that something? As a 60's radical you can pump a bullet into someone's head, and a few years later, in the same state, you can become an assistant college dean!

Only in America!

Erica Huggins was the lady who served the Panthers by boiling the water for Mr. Rackley's torture. Some years later Ms. Huggins was elected to a California School Board.

How in the world do you think these killers got off so easy?
Maybe it was in some part due to the efforts of two people who came to the defense of the Panthers. These two people actually went so far as to shut down Yale University with demonstrations in defense of the accused Black Panthers during their trial.

One of these people was none other than Bill Lan Lee. Mr. Lee, or Mr. Lan Lee, as the case may be, isn't a college dean. He isn't a member of a California School Board. He is now head of the US Justice Department's Civil Rights Division, appointed by none other than Bill Clinton.

O.K., so who was the other Panther defender? Is this other notable Panther defender now a school board member? Is this other Panther apologist now an assistant college dean?

No, neither!

The other Panther defender was, like Lee, a radical law student at Yale University at the time. She is now known as The "smartest woman in the world." She is none other than the Democratic senator from the state of New York---- our former First Lady, the incredible Hillary Rodham Clinton.

And now, as Paul Harvey said; You know "the rest of the story." Pass this on!
This deserves the widest possible press.
Also remember it, if and when she runs for President!

Thought this was worth while reading.

Current - #201 - #18 - At least two different “worlds” …..

One “world” is a world filled with the imperfect “human beings”.
The other “world” is the “perfect world” filled with peace, harmony and bliss.

The world filled with the imperfect “humans” is filled with such things as the desire for food, shelter and survival (protection and safety). These “imperfects” developed the ideas of power, force, “haves and have nots”, motivation for a “better” life, improvement in their living conditions, accumulation for a rainy day, and more. With these desires came tension, disorder for a few, safety for a few, and a constant feeling of change. Change was a hope and change was a “disorder”. Some were content, some were unhappy. Everything was not the same! There were great differences!

The other “world” was without pain and suffering. It was with peace and bliss. It had its own language and definitions. It felt no need to be caught up in the “other world’s” problems. Somehow or other food , shelter and survival “were taken care of”. In fact, it often had its own communities, its own followers. They could communicate with each other in their own “language and ideas”. There was no need to communicate with the “outside world”, the world of the “imperfects”. “Join us” or live in the world of the “imperfects”. Isolation by ideas, language or philosophy seemed a likely answer to the pain and suffering of the “imperfect world”. Why challenge bliss?

So, we have at least two worlds.
They both have a right to exist. They both have a reason to exist. But they are quite different!

What happens in the meantime? Who changes? Who becomes responsible in the “meantime”? How do they express their responsibility?
If two worlds exist on one planet, how do they exist? …. In “isolation”?
Perhaps this is the way … isolation.
If neither world insists on its way, and they do not interfere in each other’s pursuits, perhaps “isolation” works. If the followers of one support the philosophy of “their world”, both spiritually and financially, and nether side uses the treasure of the other, “isolation” might work. But if the two mix in treasure and/or ideas, you have immediate conflict!

Since there are little means of communication, it is important that “isolationists” accept their role. There will probably be no way ever to communicate successfully. Each world will have to find its own way to survive.
The “secular” world”, the “religious “world, the world of “peace and bliss”, the world of “imperfects” …. (and more) …. WOW! We have a problem!!!!

Perhaps a few will try to “bridge the gap”, but for sure, it will only be a few!!
Since most of us will be unable to “bridge the gap”, the best we can hope for is compassion. Neither acceptance or allowance will be successful. You cannot accept or allow something you don’t even understand. Compassion for “isolation” is the best the many can hope for.

“No more war”! …. “Peace for all”! …. “No more killing”! …. “Save the whales”! … “Save the trees”!
“Save the environment”! … “Save the ozone layer!” …. “No more baby killings”! …. Etc., etc, etc.

It’s a Constitutional right…. But does it “solve” anything? …. Whose world???

Current - #210 - #17 - It’s just a sign….

"WE WOULD RATHER DO BUSINESS WITH 1000 AL QAEDA TERRORISTS THAN WITH A SINGLE AMERICAN!"


(This sign was prominently displayed in the window of a business in Philadelphia. You are probably outraged at the thought of such an inflammatory statement. One would think that anti-hate groups from all across the country would be marching on this business...)

“And that the National Guard might have to be called to keep the angry crowds back.
But, perhaps in these stressful times one might be tempted to let the proprietors simply make their statement . . .

We are a society who holds Freedom of Speech as perhaps our greatest liberty. . .”

(And after all, it is just a sign. You may ask what kind of business would dare post such a sign?)


Answer: A Funeral Home

(Who said morticians have no sense of humor?)



(Yet another lesson about judging before having all the facts!)

Current - #201 - #16 - Just Suppose ……..

Let’s play a game …. “Just Suppose….”
(The ideas mentioned do NOT have to be real. Some ideas may seem to have substance; but that’s NOT the point! This is a game…. “Just Suppose!”)

Suppose France and Germany do NOT feel threatened; or at least the politicians or their spokesman put out the word that “They don’t feel threatened anymore.” After all there’s no Russian threat, no nuclear threat, no land grab or “domination threat”, etc.

Suppose France and Germany think they can protect themselves. They don’t see any reasonable threat they can’t protect themselves against. After all, France has a vast percentage of Moslems in their world and they have active business and financial interests in Iraq. If anybody has good intelligence connections it should be France! Germany sells restricted goods and science to Iraq so they, too, should be aware of Iraq thoughts and movements. They, too, must feel secure.

Suppose these two countries AND OTHERS feel they no longer need the assistance of the U.S.A.!

Suppose they feel financially able to “get along”! They have vast public medical and retirement programs. (In France, you retire with 75% of your final salary!)
Suppose the general population is about as informed and logical as most general populations are. And suppose they live in an environment of reasonable freedom (that is… NOT ruled by a military, secret police, dictator state….) This “general population” tends to be segregated into…..

A small percentage of so-called “intellectuals”,
A small percentage of so-called “teachers and professors”,
A small percentage (although most highly influential) media spokes persons (NOT fair and balanced!)
A small percentage of “rich folks”, industrialists, power users (contributors to their favorable parties or personalities)
A large percentage of people who live off the “largess” of the government (the army, police, fire, program administrators, etc.)
And a major portion of “the general public!”

Who is talking for these people?
Who is making the decisions for these people?
Does the “general public” have the information, the intelligence or the desire to really understand? (Are they just “too busy just getting along”?)

But who is “demonstrating”? Who is “claiming to know”? Who is trying to make “policy”? On what BASIS?

Suppose, just suppose the U.S.A. is not felt needed anymore?
The U.S.A.’s financial help is not needed, at least with the strings attached! (Anything “free” is, of course, accepted!)
The U.S.A.’s scientific help is not fully required in nuclear, bio-logical, bio-chemical, space technology, defense, etc. The U.S.A. is “just not needed”! (The U.S.A. can be accepted, can be used, but “for free”!,.. no strings attached!)
The U.S.A.’s so-called “consumer market” seems no longer “necessary” for the financial and social health of the world.
Again ….. “The U.S.A. seems no longer necessary for the world!”

What of the U.N.?
What of N.A.T.O.?
Are “they” irrelevant now?
What of the efforts to extend democracy, the “democratic way” of thinking and governing?

What happens if certain parts of the world is wrong? … Then what?
Do the changes of the street determine “policy”? …. Are “they” going to be “responsible”? … What will “they” do to carry the burdens of their mistake? … How will “they” repair the damage? … the loss of life, the loss of direction?

Do people demonstrate without clear alternatives? … clear policies for correction? Or are the “demonstrators” just demonstrating… demonstrating “against” with no alternatives, no “plans for corrections”!
Again … What if “they’re” wrong? How will they correct the corrections or damage they have caused?

Again … “Just Suppose”

I kill you in the name of my God Allah. He tells me to kill all who are not like me or oppose me!
I kill you in the name of Jesus Christ, my God. He tells me to kill all who are not like me or oppose me!
I kill you in the name of any God. He tells me to kill all who are not like me or oppose me!

Question … Whose God is the right one?
If I raise a question of right or wrong in the name of GOD, it will all depend on how my GOD is translated.
Are there certain questions that should not be a God issue?
Are there certain issues of “belief” that should be kept “personal” not national?
Are there certain issues of God that should not be “policy” since all Gods are not the same.
NOTE: I am saying “certain”….. NOT “ALL” or “NONE”!!

The tricky part is to determine which issues are “certain”. And “who” is to make this determination?
Human beings are not all the same and certainly not all are “perfect”.
But, not to at least think about this dilemma, just to “demonstrate” without logic or reason, seems self-defeating. Just “to be against” is not an answer!
A Challenge!!!! …..If you are looking for “a smoking gun” that means that the gun has been fired!!!
Do you wait for the “warehouse” of mass destruction devices to be sold or given to the “delivery systems” ( i.e. the “terrorists”) or is it better to destroy the “warehouses” now before they become “suppliers”?

If reading all this gives you a headache, just “get along” and hope for the best!
If you feel you can’t do anything about all this, just “get along” and hope for the best!
If you, at least, consider these ideas, you ARE DOING something about all this!
Test your ideas against others. Discuss your ideas with others. But, at least, HAVE SOME ideas, some alternatives, some corrections. Take responsibility, just don’t be “against”!

Current - #201 - #15 - Stimulous Package.....

What would happen if the “Stimulus Package” was sent to

the“consumers”? ….. “OR” ….. What would happen if the

“Stimulus Package “ was sent to the “business community”?

Do you want to encourage more “business activity”, more new, enlarged plants, more jobs available, etc.
“or”
Do you want to give “consumers” more money so they can spend more?

If people spend more, business will have to increase their sales and perhaps their jobs (that is, if “worker productivity” doesn’t absorb the increase in sales activity!)
If you want to start more businesses or increase their spending on more equipment, increase the volume of purchases, and try to make it more possible to make a better profit, the “incentive” should go to business.

If you’re a Democrat, you believe “the people” should have the “incentive”.
If you’re a Republican, you believe that “business and investment” is the better way to a more permanent solution to a stumbling economy.

Not too difficult to figure out! …. Where do you stand?

Do you think a “Tax Cut” to the people to give them more of their own money is the best way?
Do you think that a “Tax Cut” only benefits the “rich”? (despite the fact that the “rich” already pay over 40% of the total bill, although they represent less than 1% of the population!)
Do you know that if the “rich” were to pay a 100% tax, the USA could only run for about 6 weeks! If you took all the income from the so-called “rich”, you wouldn’t approach the total amount of money the Government spends!

So what’s wrong with all the “stuff” you hear about?
To give more money to the people to spend; or, give entrepreneurs and business a “stimulus” to grow a stronger economy?
Will business follow “consumer” demand, or does “business” need a temporary “stimulus” to gain confidence in the future and grow a stronger economy?
Which comes first?
Are you a Democrat or a Republican? …. or ….What’s in the best interest of the country?

BIG DIFFERENCE!!!

Without a stronger and growing economy the USA will not have a future!
Jobs,(and hence income from these jobs), are created by people willing to take a “risk”….. stockholders, banks and “rich” individuals and corporations. … The “risk” to lose all, the chance to be rewarded!!!
That’s quite different than “leaning” on someone else to provide sustenance.
Yes, there are “corporate” crooks! Yes, the GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) leave the price times so-called earnings ratio a chancy number at the very least! Yes, certain “rich” people do not share their good fortune well! Yes, yes, yes!! You need the “risk takers”

BUT, relying on your government to provide you with your well being is a “short sided dream”!!

Current - #201 - #12 - Iraq Choices!

There are only two main choices!! ….. You choose!!!

1. Do you want to see the “mushroom cloud” first? …… OR

2. Do you want to prevent the “mushroom cloud” from happening?

Depending on your choice, it is predictable what you are going to say!!
You simply cannot “talk” your way out of this!

Please, please consider what is being said here.
To repeat … “You simply cannot “talk” your way out of this!”

If you begin with the “U.N. … Coalition…. You haven’t made your case yet. … etc.”; everyone knows which question you chose!!! The rest is “blah, blah, blah!!!”
Look at the two choices again!!

The media is filled with “words”, but……
Again…”Which choice is being made?” …. Which of the two main questions is being chosen? It’s too simple!!!

Another comment is worth mentioning…..
An acquaintance said … “I don’t want to be responsible for 50,000 deaths, but since I can’t do anything about it I hope it doesn’t happen first in the USA!”
It sure is a position!! …. But……??? ……. (By the way it’s called “opting out!)

Is there any sense in discussing anything if you have not chosen one of these two main “questions”? Should we engage in more time consuming, intellectual posturings? ….. Blah, Blah, Blah!!!

Make a “choice”!!!

The “listening world” has become involved in “great” discussions over the decisions involved in a “pre-emptive attack” policy decision.
“Pre-emptive” means …” before anything happens”!!!
As has been said before…”If you’re looking for a smoking gun, it’s already too late!!!” “Pre-emptive” means before the gun smokes … before it is fired! If you understand the meaning of “pre-emptive”, you never will have a “smoking gun”!!

If you reject the “pre-emptive” policy, you can require any type of conditions …. U.N., coalition, etc….. You can then begin all your “discussions”! But you must make a choice “first” of the two main questions. Or, at least, be responsible for the choice you made! Not only is this your choice but you must take the responsibility for the eventualities that come from your choice!!

If the U.S. is physically more threatened by the continuing technical advances of an enemy, you must bear the responsibility for this increased threat and its consequences.
If looking for “more proof” you engage in a delay of action, you must bear the responsibility for that decision to delay.
There is “personal responsibility” involved here!
This is not just “talk”!
You simply cannot have it “both” ways!

So there it is …….

“A smoking gun, more proof, wrong policy, coalition, U.N. etc.” …… OR …
“A pre-emptive policy …. (i.e. Prevent further possibilities of more danger”)!

Which one do “you” want to be responsible for?”

Current - #201 - #11 - “The stock market” -Valuation vs. Gambling

A “B.T.” letter to The Motley Fool

After reading the various "replies" I am struck with the use of words like "value" and "P/E Ratio" etc. You would have to be a magician to make accurate sense out of any of the data put out by a specific company in a "financial review". How their accountant figures "good will", expenses, investments, etc. is a matter for he and his client to decide (without going to jail, that is!) We'll never know if the profit is part from operations, and part from re-evaluation of property, inventions, etc., or/and , part from investments.
P/E ratio is suspect! But so is "valuation" or "revenue", or etc, etc.!
The previous "replies" include these undefined terms and are not much help in deciding what to pay for a stock. If I decide to invest my profits in more advertising this year to get more of a client base, it isn't that I've not made a profit but it is my decision to use that money to gain market share. This would lower my P/E ratio. But, is it a good plan for the future of my stock? As a buyer of this stock, how would I evaluate this decision? How do I evaluate the price I would pay for this stock?
The idea that something is overpriced or under priced depends on how you would evaluate this set of conditions. Also, you would have to rely on the numbers given by the company for any of these considerations.
I believe all of this is a definition of "RISK".
Are we making a decision of valuation or are we merely "gambling"!!!

I would respect your response.... glfstudent

Current - #201 - #09 - Chapt. #09 – Did these companies really make a profit?

Just now we are finding out that “accounting procedures” may have been used to inflate profits in many large and small firms!
These are “legal” accounting procedures. They may be “misleading” and/or “immoral” but they do not seem to be “illegal”!
You can sell an asset (a part of the company) and reduce your overhead costs by “applying the money you received from this sale” to reduce your overhead costs! Yep! You can show a reduction in the overhead costs; thereby, showing an increase in your profits. In other words, you can show a more “profitable” picture for the year. And, of course, your stock price will move up. It’s all legal!!

So what if you didn’t know this!!

You’re no accountant and you couldn’t read a company’s statement anyhow!
So you bought the stock because the year’s earning and profit picture looked better. You didn’t know that the company didn’t make an increase in profits from its normal business. It just showed an increase!!
Now, they tell you, that “brokers” and “analysts” are just “salesmen” (hucksters). Even if a company’s own “analyst” said to its own company that a certain stock was a “dog”, the company put out a “buy” recommendation on an increase in profits; knowing all along that the increase was an “accounting” trick! Yep! It’s a “legal” trick even if it was “misleading”. You were plain “greedy” to buy the stock. All you were looking at was the increase in business profits! The trading companies and their “analysts” recommendations be “damned”! The fault is “yours”!!

What this has done is to weaken the public’s faith in the “stock markets”, the Mutual Funds, the whole financial structure!! What can you believe? … Who can you believe?
Are your pensions safe? Are the companies you’re invested in “making real money”? Where are “real numbers”?

Not only are there investigations of accounting firms, but “analysts and their companies are being looked into. And how about restating “real earnings” from the companies they audit? What is the “real” price times earnings number? How much of the earnings are gained outside of the companies normal business? Gained by “accounting procedures ….. the sale of assets to outsiders at a competitive price .. the sale of assets to wholly owned or offshore entities at inflated values …. And even to wholly owned subsidiaries that have company employees as investors and whose performance is guaranteed by the main company itself!!

This is not only “tricky” but very “unsettling”. Again, it may all be “legal”, but it sure is immoral, to say the least.

It will be a long time before this whole mess is straightened out, but in the meantime, it might be a good idea to find out what is happening to your investments and to your future “security”.

It doesn’t sound “good”!!

Current - #201 - #8 - I’m at a loss as to the difference between.....

Soldiers, Terrorists, Freedom Fighters........

A lot of conversation and argument is involved in the use (or miss-use) of these words. Legal discussions take place. Rabid political discussions take place. But “What’s the difference?”
Is a “soldier” a murderer? Other than the fact he/she is dressed as a particular National, and supposedly only firing at other “soldiers”; is he supposed to “kill” …. to murder? What about “collateral damage”?
What’s the difference between “killing” and “murdering”?
If a “soldier” decides to stop “killing” and holds up his hands in “surrender”; does his “murdering” suddenly stop? Is he held “accountable” for his actions just prior to “holding his hands up”? Is the fact that he is in uniform suddenly give him a certain “legal status” for his prior actions?
Boy! This already stirs up a controversy!!
Let’s continue…..

What makes a “terrorist”?
Is the fact that he/she wears no National uniform, will “eliminate” anyone (combatant or civilian), and has no National purpose make him/her a “terrorist”? Is the reason for his “mayhem” important or does any cause or purpose make him a “terrorist”? Is the fact that one of the reasons he /she doesn’t have for this mayhem is the acquisition of another’s land , make him a “terrorist”?

How does this differ from a “Freedom Fighter”?
Is the fact that a “Freedom Fighter” represents a faction in a particular land, operates his mayhem in that land, represents an opposition to the existing Government in that land, and has a cause in that land make him a “Freedom Fighter” as opposed to a simple “terrorist”? Does the “killing” or “murder” by a “Freedom Fighter” have a special legal significance as opposed to the “killing” or “murder” of a “soldier” or a “terrorist”?
Let’s continue…..

What makes a “non- combatant”?
Is the fact that a “non- combatant” wears no “uniform”, makes no attempt to “kill” or “murder” give him/her a certain legal significance? Suppose the “non-combatant” hides, supports, spies for or actively misleads for a group that is actually doing the mayhem; does this change his status or the legal significance related to his “non-combatant” status? When is a “non-combatant” actually a “non-combatant”? What is an actual definition of “combatant” or “combating”?…. Interesting point, eh? What if he/she figuratively “holds up his hands” and surrenders? Is all forgiven? What then is the legal” status?

Let’s continue……
Is “killing” or “murder” the only action that is legally recognized as “actionable”? Of course not!!! Aiding and abetting are also “actionable”! But what is the “status” of those caught in the act of “aiding and abetting”. Are they “non-combatants”…. indirect “soldiers”….. freedom fighters …. terrorists …or what?
This hue and outcry over the label and legal status of the name given to various types of people engaged in a struggle are both confusing and, sometimes, quite misleading. Is the clear definition of these words so complex that no one in authority wants to make a direct, explicit definition? Or is it “politically” awkward to commit oneself to anything clear and explicit?

Before one tries to oppose or ratify a point of view in regard to the actions or beliefs taken by any of these “words”, it would be a great idea to first announce your own personal view of these differences before starting out on any personal statements or beliefs! … (This goes for reading about these things!)

Definitions - #301 - #52 - How to be informed!

Are “bumper sticker” sayings adequate for complicated issues? …. (What if the experts disagree?)
Do people have “uninformed” and “unproven” conclusions?
Is a vote by the uninformed “viable”?
Is it “impossible” to deal with “the people” rather than their governments?
How to get young people interested in anything that’s not “physical” or “personally emotional”?

On “being informed”……. (a few of the questions…)

How to speak? …. What to say? …. Speaking to the public in “general” (Is there a “public in general”?)…. Not giving the enemy your “game plan” in an effort to keep “people” informed…. What of a different “expert’s” opinion? (which “book” do you believe and why?).... The people’s constant changing of their minds…. The people’s changing of policy (war or not war…and what else?) …. What is the meaning of “values”?

You must be able to “reason” and “think”. Somewhere, somehow you must learn how to seek “alternatives”. You simply “can’t” be informed without these two things. The search for “definitions” must be a part of your understanding.
Look at the questions!.....

“Being informed” is complicated!.... Not everyone has the “access” to the material and the people. Suppose each of the authors has an “agenda”? Are you capable of knowing this?
“Being informed” is complicated!.... Not everyone has the “desire” to be informed as well as is possible.

Given the differences in “opinions”, who is to be believed? Is the opinion worth considering? Has the author of this opinion sufficiently, in your mind, given adequate proof? Can adequate proof ever be “sufficient”, in your mind? Can you just “consider” two differing opinions without drawing your own opinion? Is just “considering” a mark of progress in understanding?

“Being informed” is complicated!!.... (How else can you “consider” these questions?)

Current – #301 - #51 - What exactly do you want America to become?

Do you want America to become “the world’s policeman”?
Do you want America to become “the world’s answer to poverty and inhuman conditions”?
Do you want America to become “a world evangelist for Democracy”?
Do you want America to become “a world military power”?

Or…. Do you want America to try and protect its “standard of living”, its particular “values”, and its present “defensive posture”?

All of this requires a “price to pay”! Are you willing to give up something? Are you willing to “pay” some price?
If “it” requires you to give up some privacy, are you willing to do it? If “it” requires you to give up some of your Constitutional values, are you still willing to “pay”…. to give up?
How about some “freedom of speech”? If you can’t say “FIRE”! in a crowded theater, what is permissible in a state of war?

It is interesting to find those persons unwilling to do anything while we are at war! What do they “give up”?
Do those who love the Constitution so much, are they among those who won’t pay any price?

Do we abandon the Constitution? Do we forget about our cherished, hard won values? No!...but we modify , carefully, those that are inappropriate in a state of war. Do we have to attack our Constitution? No…the temporary modifications will be small and, we hope, in a short time span.

We don’t want to be the “world’s policeman”!
We cannot solve the world’s poverty problem with our own resources!
We don’t want everyone to love Democracy. We already know that some civilizations are not ready!
We understand the limitations of military power! After all, we don’t want anything from anybody. All we want is a way to preserve the American continent, with peace and justice for all!

What exactly do you want America to become?

Current - #201 - #7 – A “B.T.” letter on the World Trade Center and 9/11 bombings!

***October 14, 2001 ***Please take the time and read it carefully...all the way thru!

Dear Sirs,
I am writing this letter in hopes that someone will gain some personal perspective and peace during today’s dramatic changes. I do not think you will hear these ideas from anyone in the political process or anyone whose public or private stature, or reputation, is dependent on the acclaim of the public. I encourage you to use all or part of these comments in any useful way you deem appropriate. I do not seek public office or public acknowledgment in any way. I sincerely wish to offer a simple explanation of what’s happened to us in hopes that a more simple understanding will help in reducing the pains of anxiety and stress that appear to have affected so many people.

I believe the partial answers lie in expressing, in the right simple words, an understandable description of “what and where” we are now.

It is abundantly clear that America has had the same concerns (serial murder, gangs, terrorist acts, etc.) before; but, this was so enormous and so clearly an act against America (indiscriminate civilians without a chance), that America was forced out of its semi sleep, its natural reaction to talk its way out, to delay, to put off, etc. So, America always did have these concerns; but now, they are on the front burner like every other country. We are forced to personally protect our “way”. This is the first time on our soil!!! This is not a World War II where nations are trying to take territory. This is about protecting a way of life. This is about an opposition that does not share our value of life but thinks it has an alternative plan for its “believers”.

If you believe it is fundamentally a case of “Haves versus Have-nots” you can reason your own position in where we are now. If you believe it is a religious or territorial conflict you may think differently.

The solutions are an entirely different matter!!

I would not, for one minute, attempt to dissuade you from your “meditative” or “religious beliefs. That’s what you own! …. That’s what you believe. . I also agree that certain “documentation” may serve your beliefs. If I have a different view, it is not to in any way to denigrate your views, it is merely that I do not fully equate your experiences and their effects, with my own present understanding of what’s going on.
It is a matter of simple “difference” between us. It has nothing to do with “good or bad, useful versus useless, etc.” It is merely a matter of “difference”. After all we are both trying to achieve the same general ends, namely, an end to this useless violence.

I hope you truly understand my position in all this. By all means continue to follow your own beliefs.

For more than human history, there has been a battle between the “Haves and the Have-nots”. The beginning of war started when a group of so called human beings found out that they could grow a surplus … i.e. more than they needed. Another group in the north were unable (for one reason or another) to produce just exactly or maybe even slightly less than they needed for themselves. Soooo .. they found out about the group that could raise a surplus and decided to use force and “TAKE” whatever they wanted from that “surplus group”. …Thus was the beginning of war!

In its simplest form, the root of the problem “now and in the past” has always been the battle between the “Haves and the Have-nots”. Yes, they have hidden this “battle” in many different terms.
Such terms as Religion, as in Protestants versus Catholics in Ireland (it’s nothing but a Have Have-not battle between the North with its viable economic system and industry and the less productive south where there are more Catholics).
Such terms as a “Religion mixture”, as in Islam (the difference between the overwhelming numbers of believers in the ancient Islam traditions and the “new” Fundamentalist, the terrorist faction).
The “Have Have-not” battles that continue in the USA.
The Sudan is where the so-called leadership is in the power for itself and the population be damned. Etc., etc.
Many of the problems lie in unstable leadership where there is a military backed leadership which controls the meager assets of the country “for its own comfort”, or, a tribal committee in which each “chieftain” tries to defend his territory (of course, including all the assets in his territory). These so called leaders or governments do not produce anything of value for their citizens. There’s no economic plan, no economic opportunity, no advances in the public infrastructure and many times not enough food or water. The governments do NOT serve the people … just themselves! It really makes no difference what you name it. It’s a matter of a battle between the Haves and Have-nots!
However, we are NOT engaged in Nation building. The people will have to organize themselves. We can go into a limited partnership to help in providing limited services for the people; but, we CANNOT select the leadership or the type of government in any country!!
Somehow or other, the experiment where everyone has the same amount of everything (except of course, those in a “leadership” position which preserved perks for themselves) failed horribly. This system curbed motivation, experimentation, risk, opportunity, etc.
Other so-called “systems” including “tribal councils”, warlords, small separate states (the leaders of which could never really agree on anything) all left a “growing” population with no real economic or industrial base.

So if you were lucky and were one of the few that were able to manage an education, you quickly realized you had no better future, nor hope of a better future, when you returned to the country in which you originally came. You returned with no hope. So you got angry and decided to at least do something.
Some charismatic leader arose and said “Kill Americans. They are the source of your frustration!” So you finally had a plan to relieve your own frustrations….

This all starts as the result of a “Have Have-not” scenario.
One group has, (more or less), been able to organize a society in which, (more or less), there is a choice, an opportunity to raise oneself up; an economic system that, (more or less), is productive and can actually produce a surplus; and a society which is, (more or less), free to exercise certain rights of free speech and criticism, rights of free practice for all religions and thought systems, and other rights that seem more or less “protected” as a policy. It’s not perfect and some people actively protest this fact (although they continue to offer no “successful alternatives” …they’re just “against” something!!!)
On the other hand, we have large groups of people in this world who have been unable to organize themselves into a more “productive” society. Food, shelter and defense have not been adequately shared nor encouraged. There is a “hand to mouth” existence that doesn’t seem to be changed. These are the Have-nots. They want what the Haves have!!! Anyway they can get it!
The “Red Guard” in Germany bombed and terrorized Europe 20 years ago. The Irish situation still exists. Sudan, Ethiopia, most of Africa, etc still have this same problem. IT IS NOT NEW!!

Even the USA has the same problem. The McVeys, the armed militia units, the Skinheads, etc. all have their “griefs” and commit murder in their name to so-called “right the wrongs”.
These are not “terrorists” they are simply murderers, serial killers! America is filled with Americans and some American murderers. So is France, Italy, Israel, Egypt, Islam, etc. It’s all the same!! It still starts with frustration between the Haves and Have-nots.

I think it’s simple. I think we haven’t wanted to realize it. I think we realize that we don’t want to give up our unusual, hard earned, lucky advantage. We can share some of our material surplus to a point. We do not wish to make this “point” so it interferes with our current standard of living. We also realize that mere material sharing WILL NOT permanently solve the Have/ Have-not problem. The more you give the less the incentive to change. This is our real dilemma.

I fully believe that once you can put into words what you think the real problems are you can more successfully cope with our present realization. True, that once you have truly experienced this uncomfortable reality and have escaped; having to go backwards is a terribly difficult thing to face. But as long as you’re in the USA it is of a great deal less concern. A concern? Yes! …. A lesser concern? Yes!!

This “Have/ Have-not” conversation was something I felt I needed to express.

Thank you for your indulgence!
Respectfully submitted…. Bill T.

Definitions # #301 - #06 - The Mercenaries

Suppose somebody offered you your first job … your first real paycheck and food and shelter. All you have to do for this is to kill people. If all you’ve ever seen is killing and war, what’s the big deal!! After all, you grew up in this environment and it doesn’t seem so unusual…. It’s a “fight to the death”!

My friend you are now a “Mercenary”……

You have become a paid “killer”. You don’t care what nationality, or what race, or what religion … you are being paid to obey orders and kill anyone. By the way, prisoners are an “inconvenience”. What do you do with a prisoner? You have to feed him, house him, guard him, and provide him with many other services that you don’t enjoy yourself!! … So, don’t take any!!!
You may be called a “terrorist”, a “murderer”, a “freedom fighter”, a suicide bomber” … what do you care? You have a “job”!!!
Sometimes you are paid to kill the “innocent” … the civilian, the men, the women, and the children! So what … you have a “job”!!
And, yes, sometimes you are paid to kill other “nationals”, other people of different religious back rounds, other “specific targets”! So what …. You have a job!!

What does the “civilized world” do with people that think like this??

In the animal kingdom they are referred too as “rogue animals” … killing for killing’s sake!
They are usually “loners”, misfits… beyond normality. But what if a recognized group sees no harm in employing these people? What do you do?…And, what do you do about the people who employ these people?… And, what do you do with these “employees”!

This is the present “state of affairs”…….

In one sense, the conclusions are too obvious. It’s “them or me”! I do not think it is even perceivable to “negotiate”, “to talk”. We’re much beyond that! We cannot “negotiate or talk” our way out of this one!
These are people from a separate civilization. The world must recognize this as an “aberration”, an unfortunate “mutation”. If you have been involved in this environment for the last 30 years or more, you simply do not think like the rest of the industrialized world. Is there room for more “worlds”? Can the “industrialized” world live in the same space as “another type” of world? Can there be many different “worlds” in the space we refer to as “the World”?
If the “worlds” are kept separate and one “world” does not interfere with the other “worlds” that share the same space … then, I guess, you could “survive”. What do you do if the “worlds” begin to interfere with each other? And, what do you do with these “employees”!

This is the present “state of affairs”…. I don’t think we can talk our way around this one!!Definitions

Current - #201 - #4 - I'm at a loss as to how to deal with various ethnicities....

I’m at a loss as to how to deal with a….“different”, politically encouraged, enthusiastically defended, independent ethnic group.
I’m at a loss as to how to successfully deal with a culture or language other than “American”.
I’m at a loss as to what we’re supposed to do with people who live amongst us but are different and/or simply not interested in our rules, laws, or customs.

“They” are, as discussed, a “different”…. politically encouraged …. enthusiastically defended … independent ethnic group.
Some of them may already be American citizens!They “live amongst us”!!
They share the “bounties” of being in America….. and many share in the financial costs of America.
Some risk their lives and fight for the American ideal.

So what’s the problem? ……..
“I’m at a loss as to what we’re supposed to do with people who live amongst us but are different and/or simply not interested in our rules, laws, or customs.”

If your original culture is personally crowded and filled with people, you speak in a normally loud voice to be overheard. Now, however, you are not in a personally “crowded” space but, because of your normal habits, you still speak with a raised volume.
In your original ethnic culture, a large family is warranted because of a normally high childbirth death rate or there is a desire to have a family “group” to support you in your old age. Now, however, the success of available, modern medicine makes childbirth death significantly less of a threat, and still you believe in large families. Old age in the American society is now publicly supported and the need for a personal family “group” support system is no longer necessary. Now, since your move to America, you may not need to have extra, inexpensive labor to run your farm or increase your income from a “family” shop. You may not “need” to have a large family.

BUT…. If you enjoy a large family , and can support a large family, and have a large family for reasons other than “extra”, inexpensive labor; in America, it is looked on with admiration. It is NOT the large family, but rather the “reasons” for having a large family that creates the problem. Being proud, being financially able, and above all, being loving and fond of your large family is a thing of profound admiration.
The size of your family is determined by the time and efforts you have to share with each member of your family…. Being loving, being financial able to support your family, being personally responsible to see your dreams come true for all the members of your chosen family are all admirable reasons to decide the size of your family.

BUT….. If you carry with you your original cultural and original environmental “baggage” into your new country, which , luckily provides an entirely different set of conditions; and you make decisions based on your “original” culture; you are creating “ethnic problems” with your more established neighbors . Our cultures look at things differently. You may be just as “right” in your own ideas, in your own “original” culture; but this new society thinks things differently! This is a different “culture”.
“I’m at a loss as to what we’re supposed to do with people who live amongst us but are different and/or simply not interested in our rules, laws, or customs.”

Well, what to do?
This is the reason for discussing this issue.
This is NOT racist! This is NOT discriminatory! This is NOT against immigration! This is NOT “anti” anything!!!
This is an attempt at finding reason and logic in what is a “Loss as to what we are supposed to do…”
Does the process of “assimilation” into the American culture have any present value? Are we to grow up as a nation of “dis-similar” people with different desires and different ways of life? Is this good or bad for the country now known as America?
Again, “I’m at a loss as to what to do, even how to think!”

And again…. Is “assimilation “ a valuable thing? Is it good or bad for America?

Current - #201 - #03 - I’m at a loss as to…..

How to “even communicate”, or in fact, “whether to bother to communicate” with a

person, who has such a “meaningless value system! (“meaningless” at least to me!)


Should you just ignore someone whose “value system” is unlike your own?
Should you even try to find a mutual ground to start a “mutual” discussion?

If you want to take the time and effort, could you just sharpen your understanding of the other person’s “value system” and let it go at that; or, do you have to try to explain your own “value system”.
If you want to take the time and effort, is it of any value to you that you try?


Conclusion:

It all depends!! ……..

If you wish to remain in contact with the other person for any number of reasons; you may try to be “politically correct”, civil, polite, engaging, etc. and stay away from any discussion where a “value system” (what’s important to you) is involved. Jokes, sports, social chit chat, etc. may serve you well and THEN go to the golf course!!! You might as well stay home and “take a warm bath” if you think you can have a “mutual exchange” with someone whose values are directly different from your own. Stay away from any meaningful exchange…. It is fruitless and will only give you a stomach ache!

On the other hand, if you want to try and expose your own “value system” for their consideration, there are certain steps you must take…..
a) First, you must be sure you understand what the other person’s “value system “ is.
b) Second, you must try to find “common language” to make sure that any thoughts you have are “received” and “mutually understood”. There is no meaningful dialogue if people are using language that is not “fully and mutually” understood. Without it, you will engage in an exercise of “oral static” (noise)!! (Again, take a bath!)
c) Try to refer to the other person’s experience in your use of language and examples.
d) Lastly….Don’t be disappointed or angry if your mission fails! All you can do is try your best. You do not need to make an enemy or lose a friend if your experiment fails. Just realize that your relationship has become more restricted.

Try to decide what is “valuable to you” before you start….. or, as soon as you recognize a “chasm of difference”.

Current - #201 - #02 – A “B.T”. letter on “Immigration”

Dear Sirs:
It was a pleasure to receive your email. I wanted to answer you as best I could.
I was only interested in the USA.
Immigration in the USA can pose a problem if the immigrants are non-productive. If they come only for protection, opportunity, free services like medical and education, or any other reason other than the desire and ability to become a productive citizen in the US economy, the USA faces a dilemma.

It is not a question of mere morality or democracy. It is an economic and standard of living question. The hard working citizens of the USA make many decisions and personal sacrifices to upgrade their standard of living. They simply would not understand how they could freely give away their time and efforts to give some one else the same standard of living without working for it. If the immigrant can become productive and earn his way, there would be no reasonable way for a US citizen to complain. How long would it take to cause great unrest in its own citizens, if the US government insisted that its working, productive citizens provide a free standard of living to immigrants that did not enter the productive marketplace.

This is an old story between the "haves" and the "have nots". If there was no incentive to better yourself, no one would be motivated to try. This "scares" people in the US. We already have a substantial problem with people who exist on the efforts of others. It's called "Welfare". It is a big problem and it keeps growing. More and more citizens do not take responsibility for their own lives. They do not seek to be productive. They depend on others to give them a standard of living. Not only do they depend on others, but they complain that what they get for free is not adequate!! This really upsets people who work hard!

How much more should one person have over another? This gets to the basics of the real problem. We happen, in the USA, to live in a sort of Democracy. It is fairly "uncontrolled" and free. But Socialism and Communism have a different idea of how to exist. Morality, different cultures, different religions, etc. have nothing to do with the idea of freedom of choice. Once you have an idea that "all" is to be controlled, all opportunities should be made the same, all standards of living should be equal … you have a different kind of country than what the USA is trying to achieve. Personal responsibility with a reasonable opportunity for all. That is NOT to say that everyone will try and seize the opportunities. But we try to make opportunities available to all.
We are not interested so much as to who has more. We are more interested that almost everyone has a chance.
Our economy mirrors this idea. To give away our treasure to provide a free standard of living just will not work in the USA. This is something other than a “free” society.
Immigration of various religions, cultures, nationalities, etc. has nothing to do with keeping our economy going so that it can provide growing opportunities for an increasing population.
The fear is that we are flooding the capacity of hard working people to support free standards of living to those who are not or don't wish to join in the working, productive society that makes all this possible.
Again, it is not the moral direction of our society, nor is it some kind of fairness doctrine that determines our views of immigration. It is the "standard of living", "choices and opportunities" that determine our thinking.
Respectfully submitted, Bill T.

Current - #201 - #31 - Everybody “Hates” war!!!

Yep!!! Everyone does “Hate” war.
When is war inevitable?
When “talking” is impossible…. When “debate” has reached an impasse…. When the people involved become impossible to debate with…..When the people involved are not interested in “debate” or in the “sharing” of ideas. (It’s like having a fight where one person tries to kill his opponent and the opponent has one hand tied behind his back. Who do you think is going to win this fight?)
When a country or an “ideology” has one idea in mind and wants to make this “ideology” fit everyone else, that “the everyone else” fights back in the only way left…. that is “physically”…that is “War”!

We can all describe “war” and it’s inevitable mark on society…. the inevitable “collateral damage” etc. That’s easy!
But what’s it’s substitute?...... What’s “the successful alternative”? …..Well?.....
What’s the sense of repeating “I hate war!” when you have no “successful alternative”?

Yep!!! Everyone does “Hate” war.

What good does it really do to proclaim “I hate war!”?
After all, you admit that “negotiating” or “sharing” ideas has come to an end. The people on the other side do not want to “negotiate”. They already have their “agenda”. They want everyone else to have their “agenda”.

Yep!!! Everyone does “Hate” war.

Those that wear the slogan “I hate war!” is as useless as …………

Government - #101 – #50 - The U.S.A. can never solve the world’s poverty problems!

Is this a possibility?
Do we have to pick winners and losers?
Is the American “pie” big enough?

What do we do about the rhetoric from the media.
What do we do about the “intellectuals” of the U.S. don’t think about the “How”.
What do we do about the “democracy” we built and now live in that is not fully appreciated.

What do we do about the American standard of living and our institutions of law and Constitution that are not meant for everybody.
What do we do about Americans that are afraid to pick one over another.
What do we do about the “thinking” that Americans believe everyone is suited for “democracy”.

Well, what to do or what to think……..
Without our Constitution and our Laws, our “Democracy” does not exist!
Does this mean that all the world’s people believe in the same things?
Is this “our way” the answer to the “world’s poverty” situation?
Does this mean that we can’t attempt to interest certain people in “our” way? (but only “certain people”!)
Will we have to choose? … You bet!
There are people that do not have any of the foundations or institutions like the U.S. There are many countries that do not share or care about the U.S.’s desire to have a uniform society. These people have a different way! …. Do we have to chose? ….. You bet!!!! (More complete)

We have to choose carefully so that we do not lose what we have; the best standard of living in the world!
We have limited treasure. We have a limit on the time and money we can spend. It has to be in our “National interest” to make the attempt. The U.S. citizenry must agree to this broad purpose before it can agree to the spending of its hard earned treasure! There are limits!!
We can tell the government NOT to spend our money on causes that do not help us.

We have to choose carefully! … We have to choose!!

Government - #101 - #11 - I’m at a loss ……

- I’m at a loss as to how to successfully deal in America with a culture or language other than “American”.
– I’m at a loss as to what we’re supposed to do with people who live amongst us but are different and not interested in our rules, laws, or customs.
– I’m at a loss as to how to “even communicate”, (or whether to “bother to communicate”), with persons of such different (or, at least to me) “meaningless value system”
– I’m at a loss as to how to interest, or, to motivate someone to try a new idea, a new approach.
– I’m at a loss as to where I “fit in” now..
– I am at a loss as to what “America or American” really stands for.

*** Simply….“I’m at a loss!!!” …. What to do? ***

Well, possibly, I can try to just live an “exemplary” life… “exemplary”, at least, by my standards!
First: I’d better understand myself, first!!! Then, and only then, can I undertake the “adventure” of going into other people’s “worlds”.
Second: I have to find out what my standards are. Do I have any?… What are they? …Can I define my “standards” in a language that can be understood by me, first of all; and then by “most”? … Can I make myself “understood”?
Third: Do I run a “hospital” for the world, or, shall I become involved only with my friends and a few groups with which I feel a mutual interest? Do I have an obligation of some sort to be involved with everything that happens in my path?
*********************************************************************

I have my own “garbage can”.
I keep a lid on it. Not everyone can throw his garbage in my can!!!!
I wish to control whose garbage is in my can!!!
Is this a selfish point of view? Is it “exemplary”?
“What’s the Successful Alternative?”

Should I take the risk of “confrontation” and express my own views in as “non-confrontational” way that I’m capable of; or, simply “shut up!!”
It’s a choice that I can make! … (It does not harm anyone but myself, as to which choice I make.)
Is it a choice I can discuss with others…especially with others I respect?
“SURE!!!” …… “You bet!!!” …….

(Perhaps this discussion can be “A Successful Alternative”?)

Government - #101 - #12 What is "money" and what does it "do"?

It seems that “money” really is the root of some evil!”
Some say that “money” is a major cause of misunderstanding and family breakup.
At the very least, it is obvious that “money” is a major influence in our lives.

Sounds simple? … But what is “money”, really?
Suppose we said that money represents goods and services that can be had at any time in the future.
Still sounds simple?

What if I print more “money” and there is no increase in the amount of goods and services I can get in the future? …It’s another word for “Inflation”!!! …. more “money” but no more goods and services!
Getting more complicated, isn’t it?

What if I print more money and there is an increase in the amount of goods and services in the future?
Who can measure the amounts of goods and services at any time, much less the increase in the total amount in a given period of time? How do you do that? How do you get an accurate figure?
Could there be an advantage in stating that the reason you are going to print more “money” is that “you” have discovered an increase in the total amount of goods and services? You could arbitrarily increase the amounts of currency to boost commercial business activity and make it “look like” you have a successful economy. Until the “money using” public got wise, you could “fake” economic recovery for a while; but then…… ??

So the amount of “currency” printed must be monitored so that there is “always” a balance between the amount of goods and services available and the amount of “currency” available!
Simple? … But wait…..

What about borrowing money by issuing a piece of paper which says “We, your Government, will guarantee you 6% annual interest for the next ten years on the amount of currency you give us now”. This is simple a piece of paper, guaranteed by the your Government, that is not “currency”, is not “money”. It’s called a “Bond”! But the government now has your currency, your “money” for the next ten years, to pay for expenses, without changing the volume of goods and services available. Isn’t that also “inflation”? By the way, who do you think is going to pay this magical 6% annual interest? The Government is not in business. It doesn’t produce anything. Its income is from “YOU”, in taxes!!

Who keeps track of the Government borrowing? How is it related to the printing of “money”? Who keeps track of the balance between these two items and the total volume of goods and services at any one given time?? …. Pretty scary stuff!!!
Yeah, but what’s this “keeping track of” business? How do you do that?

It’s called accounting. It’s called “budgets”. It’s called accounting “principles!
It has been proven that you can take the same set of business figures and give them to the top accounting firms and get different answers. Some even may show a loss where others show a profit! Yet, each is figured according to acceptable accounting “principles”. What do I do with the money I spent for a bridge. Do I take it all as an expense this year. The bridge has a life span of 10 years, 20, 30, 50? Which do I choose? Do I take 1/10, 1/20, 1/30, or 1/50 of the total cost and apply it as an expense this year. Who determines that?
I can look much better if I only spent 1/50 th. of the total bridge cost this year. Look how little I spent!! Look how low my expenses are now! Why we even have money left over to buy a small park! …. Oh boy!

So… not so simple!!

Who does the so-called “accounting”? Who makes these decisions? What do the present numbers really mean? If my expenses go up, I need more money … higher taxes! If my expenses seem to go down I have a so-called “ budget surplus”. We, either, can spend more; or, pay off our debts (the National Debt), or, we can lower taxes. Yeah but, whose doing the “accounting”! How good are the “real” numbers?

So all this has to do with the definition of “money”.

All “money” can really buy is “Time”!!
“Time” to make choices.
Money doesn’t “make choices”, but “time” to make choices. If you make the wrong choices, that’s your problem; but at least, with money, you are not forced into making a “choice”, you have “time”.
If you choose wisely, for you, you have the advantages of “money”. If you choose badly …..!!!!
If you waste your assets on temporary acquisitions (material things) then you might not have the “time” to make more important choices in the future. This is called “Saving for a rainy day!”

It’s always “choices”!! …… “Time” available to make a “choice”!

That’s what “money” can do!!!

Personal - #510 - #62 - Do you look to Government to solve all your problems?

Can the Government protect us from our own Ignorance?…..from the bad guys,,,, from our own discomfort…. from our own choices for education, diet, economic alternatives, happiness, success, etc…. I don’t think so!!

Well, what can our Government do?....
It can pass laws and regulations that satisfy the latest extreme public frauds, subject to the scrutiny of Constitutional and political and governmental pundits. Where do the excesses come from? The ecxcesses come from the public exercise of the Media. The louder the squawk, the more attention is paid. The public has “some” input, but until the Media picks it up….nothing! Included in the Media are governmental “oversee committees” that are televised and the political pundits that are covered in the Media.

What “CAN’T” the Government do….

It can’t protect us from our own ignorance…. ignorance due to the lack of interest and motivation in Public affairs. We assume that the facts come from T.V. and the media and never compare what people say or what the internet says or what we state are “the facts”….. More than half the time, we have “assumed the facts” and never check them through asking others. We are basically giving our opinions based on the “assumed” facts. How about giving your best “observations” when asked, and, not be so anxious to give “our opinions”! This is a quest for “new information”. This is a “debate” not an “argument”!

It can’t protect us from all of the “bad guys”…. Yes! There are bad people amongst us! People who want to do us harm…that want what we have just by taking it….If we try to “get in the way”, they’ll take our lives! “All” the bad people? Hardly! It would take an army of police which the public couldn’t stand for. The cost would be prohibitive. Besides who wants to live in a “police state”?

It can’t protect us from our own “discomfort”….. However our “discomfort” comes, no government can protect us from all of it. Prior to the modern age, our children were left “unprotected” from life. They were left to their own devices for the better part of the day. Today they are bussed to soccer practice, bussed to their recitals bussed to the ball games… protected all the time, or left to an “unsavory” neighborhood where “the bad people” inhabit. Obviously you can’t abolish every “bad neighborhood” nor can you expect parents to let their children go half the time. But something has changed! Parents do not handle things the way they were. Our children seem protected all the time or they’re let “loose”. There are no easy constraints. Kids seem to restrain themselves, at least for a time. There doesn’t seem to be any consequences…. no mild deterrents for misbehaving in society…. All people are taught to rely on the “government”!

It can’t protect us from “bad choices” in “education”, diet, alternative thinking, happiness, success, etc. The government does its best as a human run resource. It simply can’t protect us from “everything”!

Government - #101 - #51 - Who can reveal what the government is doing?

Which author from which secret source can reveal what he’s been doing for the government?
Which author, during wartime, can reveal what he’s been doing for the government?
Which part of government decides what is true and what is propaganda?
Who can reveal what?

When you see the various T.V. shows and listen to the various spokespeople, who can be believed?
What should form our opinions?
What should be our facts?
Is it propaganda or fact?
Is it government propaganda or “whose”?
Is there a vested interest or a political influence?
What are we to believe?

Are we just reacting or are we “planning”?
Can anyone plan for a future which is changing constantly?
Can we plan for the increase in gas prices when we don’t know how much gas the Chinese or the Indian population might use?
Can we overcome those groups that persist on no new oil drilling in Alaska or off the coast of California?
Can we plan for no new refineries or no new atomic plants or do we have to wait for a change in attitude? ….Do we just “react”?
Who says the oil company only has a profit of 10% on a gallon of gas? ….Who says the government takes 35% of all gas prices? ….. What are the real facts?
What are we to believe?

Can any legitimate administration be held responsible for gas prices?
Are the arguments ridiculous?
But suppose the general public (the “mob”) believe what they hear and make judgments on this lack of “real” information, what then? Does there have to be an improvement or just a change in politics? Will the change be beneficial? Although we don’t know what the changes might be, will a change in administrations be any better?
What’s in a change for me?

Personal - #501 - #61 - Another "Inconvenient Truth"....

What should people be really concerned about?
What should people be really interested in?

The terrorists (the Jihads, the Radicals, the Islamic Fascists, etc.) want to kill us!!! They want an end to the world’s “industrial revolution” as we know them!
Instead, we have Brittany Spears, Immigration reform, Congressional oversights, How our decision making process works, The coming election, The Iraq war, etc…. Sure, some of these are important, but “to kill us”?

What greater issue is there “but to kill us!”?

Is the great population so misinformed that they don’t see this as an issue of the greatest importance?
Is the fact that they don’t feel that they have “any” input? Does voting do anything about our National foreign policy? Does war and killing so disgust the American people that they won’t even discuss it?

Is there any solution???

Do we wait for “revolution”? This is where the uninformed mob hits the streets and the minority of “rulers” (legislators) and the highly paid and trained military fight to gain control?

Is this our future?

How do we have rational discussion?
How do we become “educated”?
What sources do we have to “inform” us?

Isn’t this the question?

Do the schools teach us to discuss rather than merely “express our opinion”?
Do ordinary people “discuss” rather than “give their opinion”?
Is this a matter of “education”, … “real” Education?

Why don’t ordinary people get involved….at least, “intellectually”?
What should make the teenagers more interested? …. (after all, they’re going to pay!)
Is it the job of the President to make the country more aware of it’s predicament with out giving the enemies a “game plan”? Is the current administration doing its job?
Who is going to change this?
Will a newly elected administration do this? … Will it also say how its going to improve the situation, or doesn’t it have a solution either?

Personal - #501 - #60 - Finger printing doesn't "show cause"

To “show cause” in court, you must have a good reason to arrest someone.
The fact that you have finger prints doesn’t mean you have “cause” to arrest or detain somebody.
The fact that somebody doesn’t speak English doesn’t mean you have “cause”
The fact that you assume somebody came into the States doesn’t mean anything unless you caught them in the “act” of committing the crime.
The courts have strict Constitutional limits!

The supposed fact that you are “illegal” or have ties to a “sabotage” group must be proved in court! Finger prints are not enough. You can’t stop someone in the streets and just finger print them without having “cause”! You can’t assume someone is guilty unless you prove the “act” in accordance with the law.
You can restrict the license of somebody to drive a car or a liquor license by making it mandatory that you first must be “finger printed”. That is a “regulation”. But you can’t prove the innocence of somebody without showing “cause” in a court of law. You must have a reason or actual evidence of breaking the law before you can stop someone.
The Constitution says so. That is America. No arrest without “cause”.

What of the “illegal”? …... You must “first” prove that he came and broke the law.
What of the “terrorist”? … You must “first” prove that he came and broke the law.
There is no substitute for “first” prove he broke the law… (No!.. “I thought so”, no “he looked like”, etc.)
To disprove the values of the U.S. Constitution. you would have to change the very things we count on!

Again…. To “show cause ” in court, you must have a good reason to arrest someone.

(Having or not having “finger prints” does not show “cause!”)