Current - #201 - #12 - Iraq Choices!

There are only two main choices!! ….. You choose!!!

1. Do you want to see the “mushroom cloud” first? …… OR

2. Do you want to prevent the “mushroom cloud” from happening?

Depending on your choice, it is predictable what you are going to say!!
You simply cannot “talk” your way out of this!

Please, please consider what is being said here.
To repeat … “You simply cannot “talk” your way out of this!”

If you begin with the “U.N. … Coalition…. You haven’t made your case yet. … etc.”; everyone knows which question you chose!!! The rest is “blah, blah, blah!!!”
Look at the two choices again!!

The media is filled with “words”, but……
Again…”Which choice is being made?” …. Which of the two main questions is being chosen? It’s too simple!!!

Another comment is worth mentioning…..
An acquaintance said … “I don’t want to be responsible for 50,000 deaths, but since I can’t do anything about it I hope it doesn’t happen first in the USA!”
It sure is a position!! …. But……??? ……. (By the way it’s called “opting out!)

Is there any sense in discussing anything if you have not chosen one of these two main “questions”? Should we engage in more time consuming, intellectual posturings? ….. Blah, Blah, Blah!!!

Make a “choice”!!!

The “listening world” has become involved in “great” discussions over the decisions involved in a “pre-emptive attack” policy decision.
“Pre-emptive” means …” before anything happens”!!!
As has been said before…”If you’re looking for a smoking gun, it’s already too late!!!” “Pre-emptive” means before the gun smokes … before it is fired! If you understand the meaning of “pre-emptive”, you never will have a “smoking gun”!!

If you reject the “pre-emptive” policy, you can require any type of conditions …. U.N., coalition, etc….. You can then begin all your “discussions”! But you must make a choice “first” of the two main questions. Or, at least, be responsible for the choice you made! Not only is this your choice but you must take the responsibility for the eventualities that come from your choice!!

If the U.S. is physically more threatened by the continuing technical advances of an enemy, you must bear the responsibility for this increased threat and its consequences.
If looking for “more proof” you engage in a delay of action, you must bear the responsibility for that decision to delay.
There is “personal responsibility” involved here!
This is not just “talk”!
You simply cannot have it “both” ways!

So there it is …….

“A smoking gun, more proof, wrong policy, coalition, U.N. etc.” …… OR …
“A pre-emptive policy …. (i.e. Prevent further possibilities of more danger”)!

Which one do “you” want to be responsible for?”