Personal - #501 - # 37 -Is the inevitable end “a simple pursuit of power?”

Some articles have been written stating that statistics show that more people are killed by warring governments than are killed by unruly citizens. The number of murders, rapes, robberies, etc. pale in comparison to the number of people killed in “political wars”.

What thoughts do these so-called” facts” lead us too?

Should we abandon “governments”?
How do you do that?
What should we do “individually” to survive in the meantime?
How should we “operate” without the structure of laws and government processes?

If a person or group gets the leaders of the police and the army to assist in the maintenance of certain “rules”, and if that group is a group which can provide the money that the army and police people want, who can override this force?
So we get a “force” of people led by a person or group which wants its needs (money, freedom, industry, education, food, shelter, etc.) from those that seem to have their needs met now. Isn’t it the same thing all over again? The “have-nots” want what the “haves” have!!

So where does the “individual” fit in? All this movement is by a leadership of a group which gains physical advantage over another group! It’s always a “group”! Never unaligned individuals! These individuals, simply, are not organized as a “group”.

So, what was the object of writing about “killing statistics and the number of people involved” at the beginning of this essay?

Again, what thoughts do these so-called” facts” lead us too?

These “article writers” never seem to have an answer as to “what does the individual do in the meantime?” ….. “What’s the successful alternative” in the meantime?

Many of their readers readily agree with the so-called “facts”, but no one seems to require a “successful alternative” at the same time!!!

Warning! ...
If readers become unquestioning “believers of these so-called facts”, what do we do with their unquestioned “beliefs of these so-called facts”?
What do you do if the person you are talking to, is simply stating his opinion based on the so-called facts he’s heard? He is not interested in “new facts”, he’s only interested in making you believe his so-called facts.

If you are a person who needs a “successful alternative” before he becomes an unquestioned “believer”, what do you do? How do you “handle it”? Where do you go?

**********************